Wednesday, February 16, 2022

Impact of Workplace Bullying


Workplace bullying is a persistent pattern of mistreatment from others in the workplace that causes either physical or emotional harm. It can include such tactics as verbal, nonverbal, psychological, and physical abuse (Boudrias et. al., 2021). The stress that is triggered by experiences such incidents can lead to devastating outcomes for one's mental and physical wellbeing (Trépanier et. al., 2013). According to Boudrias et. al. (2021), the long-term health problems experienced by victims of bullying result in a sense of helplessness and negative emotional states among employees (s). This has devastating consequences for organizations at all levels because of decreased productivity and morale, increased employee absences, high turnover rates, poor team dynamics, and reduced trust, effort, and loyalty from employees (Naseer & Raja, 2019).

Therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ) can be applied as a framework to prevent and address such issues in the workplace (McKenzie, 2015). TJ is a method through which justice and therapeutic consequences can be achieved. In the case of workplace bullying and harassment, TJ can be an extremely valuable framework for protecting victims and promoting the health and safety of the workplace. According to TJ, legal instruments and processes can be therapeutic and restorative for victims. The most effective dispute resolution strategy is mediation when supported by organizational leaders and operationalized through clear policies and processes (McKenzie, 2015). Mediation, as well as arbitration services, can be provided by qualified legal and clinical professionals with expertise in conflict resolution and emotional intelligence (Boudrias et. al., 2021).

Legal remedies for workplace bullying and harassment can be appropriately addressed when victims and witnesses are able to collate evidence on bullying and harassment incidents. Naseer & Raja (2019) suggest keeping copies of threatening notes, comments, or emails can help prove to bully (e.g., overly harsh commentary on assigned work, inappropriate jokes, etc.). Additionally, keeping a journal of the dates, times, specific location where the bullying took place, the number of people who were in the room, and other relevant details can support legal action. Céleste et. al. (2010) argues that it is the employer's duty to provide workers with information on their rights and responsibilities as it pertains to health and safety in the workplace. Those who receive adequate training and resources are less likely to experience poor outcomes at the individual, interpersonal and organizational levels.

Dr. Vinita Puri, Governor, T.J. Centre AUGP the USA

References

Boudrias, V., Trépanier, S.-G., & Salin, D. (2021). A systematic review of research on the longitudinal consequences of workplace bullying and the mechanisms involved. Aggression and Violent Behavior,56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101508

Céleste M. Brotheridge, & Raymond T. Lee. (2010). Restless and confused: Emotional responses to workplace bullying in men and women. Career Development International, 15(7), 687–707.

McKenzie, D. M. (2015). The role of mediation in resolving workplace relationship conflict. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 39, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.01.02

Naseer, S., & Raja, U. (2019). Why does workplace bullying affect victims' job strain? Perceived organization support and emotional dissonance as resource depletion mechanisms.

Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00375-x

Trépanier, S.-G., Fernet, C., & Austin, S. (2013). Workplace bullying and psychological health at work: The mediating role of satisfaction of needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness. Work & Stress, 27(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2013.782158

 


Sunday, February 13, 2022

Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Behavioural Sciences


Therapeutic jurisprudence has significant implications for legal practice, offering an approach that promotes a more comprehensive resolution of legal problems and a more personally rewarding experience for both client and lawyer. It suggests that legal problems need to be considered in the context of the client's overall wellbeing. Of course, the best interest of the client has always been a primary concern of lawyers and wellbeing is often a part of that consideration. However, therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that findings from the behavioral sciences can be used to enable a lawyer to take a systematic and comprehensive approach to promote client wellbeing in all cases


Antipsychotic Medication Violation of 14th Amendment Rights


In Riggins v. Nevada, the United States Supreme Court considered whether the forced administration of antipsychotic medication during trial violated the defendant's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. In a seven to two decision, the Court concluded that the lower courts' failure to acknowledge Riggins' liberty interest in freedom from continual, involuntary antipsychotic drug treatment without any determination regarding the need for antipsychotic medication or any consideration of reasonable alternatives constituted reversible error.

The Court stated that such error may have violated Riggins' right to a full and fair trial."

The Court reasoned that Riggins' rights at trial possibly were impaired because the side effects of the medication may have impacted his outward appearance, the content of his testimony, his ability to follow the proceedings or the substance of his communication with counsel.



Sunday, February 6, 2022

Legal Practice


Therapeutic jurisprudence has significant implications for legal practice, offering an approach that promotes a more comprehensive resolution of legal problems and a more personally rewarding experience for both client and lawyer. It suggests that legal problems need to be considered in the context of the client's overall wellbeing. Of course, the best interest of the client has always been a primary concern of lawyers and wellbeing is often a part of that consideration. However, therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that findings from the behavioural sciences can be used to enable a lawyer to take a systematic and comprehensive approach to promoting client wellbeing in all cases.

The most visible illustration of therapeutic legal practice is in the work of lawyers representing clients in problem-solving courts. However, client wellbeing is an integral part of a diverse range of legal problems. For example, family law litigation concerns not only financial and child issues but also the wellbeing of separating parties and their children and the need to promote healing.



Legal and Judicial Education

Lawyers and judges have traditionally been trained for operation within a largely adversarial approach to the law. Students entering law school commonly have an adversarial conception of the law based on their experience of dramatic portrayal of court cases in popular literature and the media. Law teaching reinforces an adversarial approach through an isolated study of cases decided on appeal involving a dispassionate analysis of fact and law. Law teaching has not taught the role of emotions in the practice of law, teaching a dispassionate approach to the legal practice and judging. The teaching of interpersonal skills has also been largely lacking.

Therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that legal and judicial education should be more comprehensive. While knowledge of the law and analytical, writing and adversarial court advocacy skills are important, it asserts that interpersonal skills are also vital. The ability to listen, to be sensitive to the emotions of others, to express empathy, to be aware of body language, to be able to communicate effectively and sensitively with others are important interpersonal skills that assist in a therapeutic legal and judicial practice. They enable both lawyer and judicial officer to promote voice, validation and respect - which research has found promote litigant satisfaction and respect for the justice system.

Click to read




Therapeutic Jurisprudence as a model for rehabilitation

FROM AN ARTICLE I SUBMITTED TO THE BAR ASSOCIATION JOURNAL IN 2004

Therapeutic Jurisprudence looks to the interface between mind and body for substantiation on the explanation for cerebral and behavioural dysfunction and for the means of its resolution. According to this approach, the physical nervous system is the means by which the inner core of the person is expressed. A healthy, positive and fulfilled mind requires a healthy nervous system. Imbalance within, the nervous system occurs thanks to the impact of stressful situations. There are situations in life that will overpower a weak nervous system like grief, maltreatment, family breakdown, crime, poverty, severance, and ruin.

The result is a physical change in the nervous system called stress. The quality of the individual nervous system and its managing capability and thus the nature of a stressful life event will determine how it reacts to worry. Medicine recognizes the adverse impact that stress produces on physical and cerebral functioning. Research suggests that stress causes impairment within the functioning of the brain. It also has been found that stress results in problems like anxiety, wakefulness, posttraumatic stress complaint, medicine abuse, and crime.

Natural law is in fact the name of one of the main approaches within western justice. Western natural law proposition emphasizes that humans are rational by nature and should be ordered according to objective and universal principles deduced from mortal nature or, as some suggest self-evidently perfective of that nature. The results of such an ordering are claimed to be the creation of happiness and fulfillment.

Still, the remedial approach to natural law isn't innovated upon the tried ordering of life according to reason or the derivate of principles of right conduct through practical logic as is supported by some natural law proponents. The law or order seen in humanity by us is expressed within the ingrained tendency in trait to develop, to grow to full eventuality through the progressive optimization of the psyche. We see that tendency to be an illustration of the expansion that is seen within the natural terrain. According to our approach, the source of that tendency is the inner core of humans. The enjoyment of full eventuality is the basis for happiness, fulfillment, and right action and is attained through ways that remove cerebral imbalance and promote self-fulfillment. 

A completely developed individual acts consonant with other populace and consonant with nature. Therapeutic justice sees the part of the law to be the creation of full individual development.
While we admit the part logic plays in guiding act, we also see the logic to be a specific model of the functioning of the entire person. According to this approach, each aspect of the psyche and thus the functioning of the physiology must be taken under consideration in considering the right action.

 There are elements in the writings of early Western philosophers such as Plato, Cicero, Marcus Aurelius, and Aquinas that are similar to those emphasized in our approach to natural law: the location of the source of natural law within the individual; the use of an inner technology to promote self-development; and the development of the full potential of the individual as a means of promoting right action (King, 1997). However, the methods advocated by these philosophers have not been widely used in the West and their practical relevance has been lost.

The psyche thus ranges from the senses that bring in information from the terrain, the mind that receives that information and is the container of memory; the intellect that discriminates, the position of feeling and suspicion which support the decision-making process and thus the pride, the sense of "I" that synthesizes the experience of every other aspect of the psyche.

Inner self, though there is no abiding person, has two connotations: lower self and higher Self. The lower self is that aspect of the personality that deals only with the relative or changing aspect of existence. It comprises the mind that thinks, the intellect that decides, the ego that experiences. This lower self functions only in the relative states of existence: waking, dreaming, and deep sleep.

 The law also recognizes that psychological imbalance impedes right action. In sentencing an offender, a court must look into the need to require an offender to have appropriate counseling or treatment to resolve psychological issues that lead to offending. However, a closer inspection of the concept of the psyche presented in our model suggests that it is richer than that underlying common criminal justice principles such as deterrence and rehabilitation.

Indeed, most of us who visit a counselor's office for advice and representation do so in reference to a law problem that arose from and/ or generates stress in our lives. Those seeking a divorce suffer the life-wrenching stress of a broken relationship; those injured in an accident go through the trauma of inhibition in day to day performing and, in some cases, the loss of work; and lots of malefactors have a history of life trauma or have had the mischance of a stressful life event that has rained their offending behaviour. Further, the court process itself into which these guests come is frequently foreign, alienating, and stressful.


Members of the bar and judiciary have also paid increasing attention to the consequences of stress in their own lives. Though some judges are skeptical about stress having any applicability to the bar, others have stressed large caseloads, the demand for prompt opinions, increased media scrutiny, and increased demands from the bar as sources of stress. For attorneys, the demands of billing to meet raised targets, having to meet deadlines, the lack of conditioning outside the law and consequent imbalance in life, the inimical nature of the practice of law and increased dissatisfaction with the character of legal practice are reported as sources of stress. Judges and attorneys also aren't vulnerable to life traumas common to humanity like relationship breakdown, illness and grief.

For Therapeutic justice, the matter of stress and thus the absence of the event of full inner eventuality are issues that need to be addressed to request the good ideal of the law fostering self-development. Generally, for the attainment of this thing, the law has been directed to the attainment and preservation of two essential principles freedom and justice. The primary focus of everyone has been in terms of the external expression of life. Hence, freedom of speech, freedom of movement, freedom of religion such like have been cherished in human rights affirmations and in legal and political writings as enabling people to completely explore and express their individuality.

The law has sought to promote social justice by furnishing equal occasion in terms of access to education, training, and employment and to the material goods necessary to promote the expression of individual tastes and interests and thus the development of the self.

Still, Remedial justice points out that a person may enjoy the freedoms cherished by the law and have access to abundant material coffers and still not enjoy fulfillment in life or attain full development. Indeed, similar people may suffer from problems like cerebral and social dysfunction and be engaged in felonious behavior and substance abuse. In addition to the fabric freedoms, the necessity is for inner freedom — freedom from stress and thus the attendant dysfunction. From this station, justice requires giving people access to knowledge and ways that promote similar freedom. This also applies to the division of justice to malefactors.

The operation of discipline could serve the demand for retribution but as an instrument of crime forestallment and recuperation, it's limited in its capability to stop offending for it doesn't give the lawbreaker the means to resolve life stress that has led to offending behasviour nor the means to deal with life challenges in the future.  The same critique applies in relation to the use of systems of reasoning or educating people as to what is right or wrong: they do not remove psychological dysfunction.


A Paradigm shift in thinking

The principal technique used to resolve the problem of stress and to promote the development of the individual is a value-based spiritual model while the behavioural focus stresses on guided count down deep relaxation technique that also focuses on an eight-point removal of negative traits that are ingrained. During the practice of relaxation, the body settles down and attains a deep level of rest—a level far more profound than simply sitting down and closing the eyes. Rest is a natural healing mechanism of the body. The deep level of rest gained during this practice dissolves stress and fatigue and thereby alleviates a wide range of physical and psychological problems.

The state of awareness gained through this practice of relaxation is fundamentally different from other states of mind. Although the body is deeply rested, unlike in sleep the mind remains perfectly alert This is the experience of that aspect of the psyche referred to above as 'the Higher Self'. Researchers have found records of the experience of inner silence in literature from writers from diverse fields, centuries, and nations suggesting that the experience is not culture-specific but universal to the human condition..
The behavioural principle is that the regular experience of pure stillness facilitates functional and organizational changes in the brain that promote the progressive optimization of each aspect of the psyche and the unfolding of full potential in life. 

Research on relaxation methods provides significant support for this model of human development and its explanation for dysfunctional behavior. In considering research on stress reduction and self-development techniques generally, it is important to note that techniques differ from each other in how they are practiced and in their effects on the mind and body. 

On a behavioral level, findings include improved marital relations, improved productivity and employee relations at work, and decreased substance abuse and recidivism. Typically, rehabilitation programs reduce offender recidivism by 10% with the higher rate of 25-30% being achieved with appropriately targeted programs. A recent study tracked offenders who had learned silence-inducing techniques while in the Californian prison system. It found that over a 15 years following release they had 43.5 % fewer new convictions than a control group.

 Impact on  Legal Practice and Legal Education

The legal method, with its emphasis on the intellect and reasoning processes, has been seen to fragment the lawyer's personality, alienating him or her from feeling and intuition and from deeper levels of the self within. Such fragmentation inevitably adversely impacts psychological well-being and the ability of the lawyer to lead a happy and fulfilling life. Some have suggested that there is a lack of spirituality in legal practice, with lawyers lacking inner directedness. Further, questions have been raised as to the worth of legal practice with its emphasis on the intellect over feeling, winning over a satisfactory outcome for all and long hours spent in generating income for the practice over a balanced life that allows for both inner and outer development and fulfillment. 

From the perspective of Therapeutic jurisprudence, the law needs to move beyond a conception of the personality that emphasizes the pre-eminence of reason. Wholeness of personality comes not from the subjection of the personality to reason, but from the optimization and integration of the psyche through the direct experience of deep silence. Such experience brings about the resolution of psychological dysfunction and integrated and measurable development in mind, body and behavior. As a result, perception, feelings, thinking and decision-making aspects of the personality operate in harmony. This is the healing of the psyche at the most profound level. However, the lack of the inner experience of the inner core and the accumulation of stress by the nervous system produces dysfunction in the different aspects of the psyche and inhibits the full development of the individual. 

Dysfunction in lawyers can fundamentally be seen to be a function of the system that produces them: legal education. Indeed, in several Western countries law students are reported to have depression and anxiety rates almost four times that of the general population (Sells 1994, 42). Sells attributes such problems not only to the pressures of legal education but to the inordinate focus on objectivity in legal education. Law students are taught to view a legal problem dispassionately, using the techniques of abstraction and reasoning. He says that problems emerge when objectivity becomes more than a way of approaching legal problems but a way of life when one is limited to a particular and restricted way of looking at the world.

Prof.Lakshman Madurasinghe


Saturday, February 5, 2022

What is walking meditation?



For Thich Nhat Hanh, the late Vietnamese monk who popularized mindfulness in the West, walking was not simply a way to get from one place to another, or an activity to be reserved for a perfect forest path. It could be a profound contemplative practice putting people in touch with their breath, their bodies, the Earth – and an awareness of what he called "interbeing."

Stress relief: how the “PEACE” method can help manage emotional responses to stressful situations


I have always been a crier. Whether I'm happy or sad, frustrated or shocked, tears have tended to be my go-to emotional response.

But throughout the pandemic, the tears dried up and I found myself turning to other coping mechanisms to deal with the daily stress and anxiety of lockdown.

When put under pressure, we all react in different ways, and some are healthier than others. But according to Amy Saltzman, MD, a holistic physician and mindfulness coach, in times of difficulty, our choices don't always decrease our stress. Sometimes, they actually increase it.



Outside judge named to preside over cases in Arbery slaying | AP News

 A judge from outside the coastal Georgia community where Ahmaud Arbery was fatally shot has been appointed to preside over trial proceedings of the two men charged with Arbery’s murder, including one defendant with close ties to law enforcement.

Court documents filed in Glynn County show that Superior Court Judge Timothy R. Walmsley was appointed to the case after all five judges in the legal circuit where Arbery was killed recused themselves. Walmsley is based in Savannah, about 70 miles (110 kilometers) north of where the slaying occurred just outside the port city of Brunswick.



Healthcare Fraud


Healthcare fraud involves wide-ranging illegal behaviors. It includes such activities as physicians who bill insurance companies or the government for services never provided, or that were unnecessary and, in many cases, harmful for the well-being of patients. Corporations are also involved in healthcare fraud, such as pharmaceutical companies that falsify clinical studies to get unsafe drugs approved for general population use. Healthcare fraud, similar to other white-collar crimes, has three general costs: financial, physical, and social. First, the United States is likely the largest financial victim of healthcare fraud in the world. 

'The Ladder of the Law Has No Top and No Bottom': How Therapeutic Jurisprudence Can Give Life to International Human Rights


In the past two decades, therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ) has become one of the most important theoretical approaches to the law. But, there has, as of yet, been puzzlingly little written about the relationship between TJ and international human rights law. To be sure, there has been some preliminary and exploratory work on the relationship between TJ and international law in general, but virtually nothing on its relationship to international human rights law in a mental disability law context. 



Friday, July 30, 2021

Science Says Your Brain Isn't Fully Developed Until You're This Age


While the age at which you legally become an adult is 18, your brain isn't fully developed yet. According to Insider, the prefrontal cortex is the part of the brain that helps with impulse control and that's still not completely done growing even when 18-year-olds are graduating high school and heading off to college, the military, working full-time, or backpacking across Europe. 

The Society for Neuroscience claims that the white matter in your brain doesn't peak until you are about 40 years of age. White matter is found deeper in the brain, while the gray matter is on the outside. White matter is made up of nerve fibers covered by myelin that serves to protect those neurons (via MedlinePlus). Maturity is connected to the prefrontal cortex, located at the front part of the frontal lobe. The prefrontal cortex is responsible for cognitive abilities and control, decision making, planning, problem-solving, and impulse control.




WHY NEUROSURGEON MIKE EGNOR STOPPED BEING A MATERIALIST ATHEIST


Neurosurgeon Michael Egnor did another podcast with Arjuna Das at Theology Unleashed, "where Eastern theology meets Western skepticism." Among other things, Egnor talked about why he ceased to be an atheist as he learned more about science and its dependence on mathematics, which is not a material thing. A partial transcript follows, taking us down to 15 minutes, with notes (more in a further installment)


Lincoln’s Uncertain Decision: Fort Sumter, 1861


On March 5, 1861, Abraham Lincoln, only president for a day, had to make a decision on what to do. Lincoln had a divided cabinet, a divided party, and a divided country. Half of his cabinet wanted war with the newly-formed Confederacy. The other half, led by William Seward, wanted peace.

In his inaugural address, Lincoln attempted to clarify his position regarding Fort Sumter and other federal property in the seceding states. Because the constitution attempted "to form a more perfect union," it follows, Lincoln argued, that the possibility that a state, on its own, could secede would render the constitution less perfect. "I therefore consider that, in view of the Constitution and the laws, the Union is unbroken" and "that the laws of the Union [will] be faithfully executed in all the States."  Lincoln considered this a "simple duty" that should "not be regarded as a menace" but as an obvious and stated purpose of the Union as expressed in the constitution. "In doing this there needs to be no bloodshed or violence; and there shall be none, unless it be forced upon the national authority," Lincoln continued. "The power confided to me, will be used to hold, occupy, and possess the property, and places belonging to the government, and to collect duties and imposts; but beyond what may be necessary for these objects, there will be no invasion—no using force against, or among the people anywhere." Should a particular place prove utterly hostile to any federal presence in a region, Lincoln promised to forgo any federal presence....

Click to read




Friday, March 12, 2021

Kathleen Folbigg: Could science free Australian jailed for killing babies?


Imagine for a moment what it must feel like if, as a mother, you give birth to four children, one after another, each of whom, as infants, dies from natural causes over a 10-year period.

Then imagine being wrongly accused of smothering them all and being sentenced to 30 years in jail for four terrible crimes you did not commit.

That narrative is emerging as potentially the true story of Kathleen Folbigg, an Australian mother from the Hunter Valley region of New South Wales (NSW).

Branded at her trial in 2003 as "Australia's worst female serial killer", Folbigg has already spent nearly 18 years in prison after being found guilty of the manslaughter of her firstborn Caleb, and the murder of her three subsequent children, Patrick, Sarah and Laura.

Click to read BBC





Saturday, July 11, 2020

Is Buddhism science?


One of the greatest twists in the recent history of nonfiction came at the end of Sam Harris's The End of Faith (2004). The book gave physical form to the message-board atheism of the early internet and launched a publishing boom for religious skeptics, but its final chapter struck a different note. Harris, it turned out, is a self-described mystical seeker with a long history of pilgrimages and discipleships under various Eastern gurus. He concluded the book by evangelizing on behalf of a scientifically filtered Buddhism that can awaken us to "the intrinsic freedom of consciousness" and help us grapple with "almost every problem we have" as a species.

Despite his infidel reputation, Harris belongs to the religious current that David McMahan calls "Buddhist modernism." This is a global assortment of Buddhist movements formed under creative pressure from the dominant Western trends of the past few centuries, such as rationalism, Protestant anti-clericalism, and Romanticism. All of them sought to counter the judgment of the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer that Buddhism is fundamentally pessimistic. At the same time, they accepted Schopenhauer's claim that Buddhism is "the finest of all religions," exceptional for its intellectual acuity and faithfulness to the human experience. In fact, a major strand of Buddhist modernism argues that Buddhism, properly understood, isn't even a religion but a uniquely empirical way of life based on meditation — "a first-person science," as Harris once phrased it.

Click to read



International courts ‘more needed than ever’, 25 years after Srebrenica

The now-defunct war crimes tribunal that convicted Bosnian Serb leaders like Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadzic over the murder of 8,000 Muslim men and boys was hailed at the time as a new era of post-Cold War accountability.

Yet the numerous courts set up in its wake now face a litany of problems like low conviction rates, attacks by US President Donald Trump and antagonistic governments, and accusations of racism.

They also need to start giving justice to victims of a new generation of crimes such as the war in Syria, the repression of the Rohingya people in Myanmar and the persecution of the Uighurs in China, experts said.

Click to read



Brain Cells that Trigger Sugar Cravings and Consumption Identified

Most people enjoy a sweet treat every now and then. But an unchecked "sweet tooth" can lead to overconsumption of sugary foods and chronic health issues like obesity and type 2 diabetes. Understanding the biological mechanisms that control sugar intake and preference for sweet taste could have important implications for managing and preventing these health problems.

The new study, led by Matthew Potthoff, PhD, associate professor of neuroscience and pharmacology in the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, and Matthew Gillum, PhD, at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark, focuses on actions of a hormone called fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21). This hormone is known to play a role in energy balance, body weight control, and insulin sensitivity.

"This is the first study that's really identified where this hormone is acting in the brain and that has provided some very cool insights to how it's regulating sugar intake," says Potthoff, who also is a member of the Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center at the UI and the Iowa Neuroscience Institute.

Click to read