The most conservative Supreme Court in a century has not yet fully put its stamp on the death penalty in America or on conditions of confinement within prisons. Nor, for that matter, have the justices delivered a recent ruling on the ways in which local officials control pretrial detention or impose hefty fines and fees on those who get wrapped up in criminal justice systems. The Eighth Amendment, as the newly constituted Roberts Court sees it, has yet to be written even though public debate over capital punishment, solitary confinement, and excessive bail often drive broader conversations about criminal justice in the United States.
Some trends, however, are apparent. The departure of Anthony Kennedy and Ruth Bader Ginsburg took from the Supreme Court two justices who supported key limitations on the death penalty and expanded protections for prisoners under the "cruel and unusual punishment" clause of the Eighth Amendment.
Pages
- Home
- Global Role
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence Centre
- Global Consultancy LLC USA
- AUGP Video
- ISTJ Therapeutic Juris Blog
- Law Resources
- Bar Association
- Oxford Journals
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Universal Declaration of HR
- UN University For Global Peace
- AUGP Int Legal Secretariat
- Law at Cambridge
- Psychology and Neuroscience Blog
- Religion and Philosophy
- Global Synod
- Medicina-OIUCM Department of Law
- Medicina Therapeutic Jurispudence FB Page
- Publications
- Seminars
- Lectures conducted and Disserations Supervised
- Research
Saturday, February 26, 2022
The Eighth Amendment, the Death Penalty, and the Supreme Court
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment