Not all is well inside the Taliban

On August 21, a strict public morality law was issued in Afghanistan. The 114-page document outlining the legislation contains provisions that cover transportation, media, music, public spaces and personal conduct. Among its most restrictive provisions are a ban on music and on women singing or reading aloud in public.
The announcement of the law provoked widespread condemnation internationally and raised questions about the direction in which the Taliban government is taking Afghanistan given past promises to ease restrictions on women.
Click to read
    

An ‘embarrassment’: Experts explain what could happen as Switzerland rejects landmark climate ruling

Five months after the judgment, the Federal government said that it has fulfilled the policy requirements of the ruling.

An unprecedented ruling from the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in April made protection from the effects of climate change a human right under European law.

Brought by a group of elderly women, the case was directed at Switzerland with the court finding the country's insufficient action to tackle greenhouse gas emissions was a breach of human rights.

The landmark judgment was heralded as a breakthrough for climate cases in Europe and around the world. As the first instance of a country being held legally responsible on this issue, it set a precedent that many are hoping will mean success in future climate cases.

What was in the ruling and how did Switzerland respond?

The ECtHR didn't explicitly tell Switzerland what it had to do next to tackle climate change, just that it had to do more.

First, Switzerland's parliament voted to reject the ECtHR's ruling in June. It said it was not "ignoring" it but that the country already had an effective climate strategy.

Click to read

The Proposed Constitutional Court for Sri Lanka

Presentation made at the National Law Summit held on 30th July at Monarch Imperial Hotel. The participants exceeding 1000 consisted of Ambassadors, Party Secretaries,  Lawyers, Professors, Academicians, Members of Parliament and Civil Society Leaders. 

Some consider it as one of the most successful improvements on the traditional European, parliament-oriented concepts of democracy and the rule of law.

 

It exists in about 85 countries around the world. Out of 27 EU nations, 16 have Constitutional Courts. Became popular between 1945-56 in Austria, Germany and Italy. It is used in South Africa, Spain, Indonesia, Thailand and South Korea. Under 1972 Constitution Sri Lanka had a Constitutional Court but many have raised questions whether it was a real court with adjudicative powers.

 

Jurist and Legal Philosopher Kelson played a key role in setting up in Austria. Federalism remains a key aspect of Austrian constitutional adjudication to this day while the constitutional court continues to serve as an irreplaceable pillar of federalism in the framework of Austrian constitutional law.

Click to read

Click for Album

SIXTH SOUTH ASIAN PEOPLES SUMMIT DECLARATION 2007

 As a member of the drafting team, I am happy to upload a copy of this declaration.

Breaking: International Criminal Court issues arrest warrants for Russia's Shoigu, Gerasimov

The International Criminal Court (ICC) announced on June 25 that it has issued arrest warrants for Sergei Shoigu, secretary of Russia's Security Council, and Valery Gerasimov, Chief of the General Staff of the Russian army, for war crimes against Ukraine.

Shoigu served as Russia's Defense Minister at the time of the alleged crimes. Shoigu was replaced in May by Andrei Belousov, a former economy minister with no previous military experience, after serving as defense minister since 2012.
Shoigu and Gerasimov are charged with the war crimes of "directing attacks at civilian objects," "causing excessive incidental harm to civilians or damage to civilian objects," and the "crime against humanity of inhumane acts."
The charges relate to Russian strikes on Ukraine's energy infrastructure between October 2022 and March 2023, the ICC said.
Click to read
    

Putin’s designs on a Baltic island are leading Sweden to prepare for war

Gotland has been a popular holiday destination for decades, but recently Swedish commander-in-chief, Mikael Bydén, claimed that Russian president Vladmir Putin "has his eyes" on the island. Concern was further ramped up, showing Gotland was just one part of Russia's ambitions in the Baltics, in the last few days when Russia published a document suggesting that it needed to reassess the maritime borders in the Gulf of Finland.

That draft decree by the Russian defence ministry, which has since been removed, proposed that Russia wanted to revise its borders with Finland and Kaliningrad (based on a resolution adopted by the Soviet Union's council of ministers in 1985) and expand its territorial waters.
Click to read  

The legal profession in 2024: AI

Can you envision a time when clients in need of legal assistance can turn to AI, instead of lawyers, for help, at least in more routine private law matters like divorces or smaller lawsuits? Maybe the plaintiff's AI talks to the respondent's AI and to the judge's AI and the various AIs sort everything out without the humans needing to get too deeply involved. I'm half joking, but then again, did the horse and buggy manufacturers immediately understand the implications of the automobile?

Click to read
    

Leaked State Department Memo: Israeli Assurances 'Neither Credible Nor Reliable'

A newly leaked internal memo shows that officials at four U.S. State Department bureaus don't believe the Israeli government's assurances that it is using American weaponry in Gaza in compliance with international law, rejecting them as "neither credible nor reliable." 

The memo, first reported by Reuters on Saturday, is a joint submission from the State Department's bureaus of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor; 

Population, Refugees, and Migration; Global Criminal Justice; and International Organization Affairs.

CLICK TO READ

The Supreme Court's 'Immunity Club' And The Advent Of Fascist Jurisprudence

I just watched a full hour of some very, very smart legal eagles analyzing what it means that the Supreme Court has decided to hear Donald Trump's immunity appeal. Six experts were interviewed by Nicole Wallace on MSNBC. She's good. Every one of the experts was good. The whole show did an excellent job of running through all the permutations and combinations of what it could mean that the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments of the Trump appeal on April 22, and what that could mean in terms of when they might issue a decision, and what that would mean about when the case before Judge Tanya Chutkan might come to trial.
I don't care how you cut it, this is the terrifying result you get when you elect a raving fascist lunatic like Donald Trump and he gets the opportunity – aided and abetted by right wing puppets in the Senate and their right-wing corporate puppeteers – to appoint a gaggle of starry-eyed authoritarian moonies to the highest court in the land. It takes only four justices for the Supreme Court to agree to hear a case. We learned today that four of the justices who went through the authoritarian training camp run by the Federalist Society, which is backed by a small group of fascist billionaires, got together and decided to hear Trump's case, which makes the absurdly authoritarian claim that he, and he alone, is above the law.
Justice Clarence Thomas, whose wife participated in Trump's conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election, has been supported monetarily by one of the right-wing billionaires that funds the Federalist Society. Although the court didn't announce the names of the justices who voted to take the Trump case, it is a certainty that Thomas was one of them. The other three are no better, because all six of the Republican appointed justices attend Federalist Society private functions, they give speeches to Federalist Society gatherings, they hire clerks approved by the Federalist Society.
Click to read  

  

Israel Is Terrified the World Court Will Decide It’s Committing Genocide

  Israel Is Terrified the World Court Will Decide It's Committing Genocide    
    
For nearly three months, Israel has enjoyed virtual impunity for its atrocious crimes against the Palestinian people. That changed on December 29 when South Africa, a state party to the Genocide Convention, filed an 84-page application in the International Court of Justice (ICJ, or World Court) alleging that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
South Africa's well-documented application alleges that "acts and omissions by Israel … are genocidal in character, as they are committed with the requisite specific intent … to destroy Palestinians in Gaza as a part of the broader Palestinian national, racial and ethnical group" and that "the conduct of Israel — through its State organs, State agents, and other persons and entities acting on its instructions or under its direction, control or influence — in relation to Palestinians in Gaza, is in violation of its obligations under the Genocide Convention."
Click to read