Normative legal theory is concerned with the ends and justifications for the law as a whole and for particular legal rules. Previous entries in the legal have examined exemplars of the three great traditions in normative theory--consequentialist, deontological, and aretaic (or virtue-centered) perspectives. There are important differences between these three families of theories at a very general and abstract level: for example, deontologists emphasize rights and wrongs while consequentialists emphasize the goodness or badness of states of affairs. And there are differences between particular theories within the broad families: within consequentialism, for example, welfarists emphasize preference satisfaction, whereas hedonistic utiliarians emphasize pleasure and pain...
Pages
- Home
- Global Role
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence Centre
- Global Consultancy LLC USA
- AUGP Video
- ISTJ Therapeutic Juris Blog
- Law Resources
- Bar Association
- Oxford Journals
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Universal Declaration of HR
- UN University For Global Peace
- AUGP Int Legal Secretariat
- Law at Cambridge
- Psychology and Neuroscience Blog
- Religion and Philosophy
- Global Synod
- Medicina-OIUCM Department of Law
- Medicina Therapeutic Jurispudence FB Page
- Publications
- Seminars
- Lectures conducted and Disserations Supervised
- Research
No comments:
Post a Comment