Normative legal theory is concerned with the ends and justifications for the law as a whole and for particular legal rules. Previous entries in the legal have examined exemplars of the three great traditions in normative theory--consequentialist, deontological, and aretaic (or virtue-centered) perspectives. There are important differences between these three families of theories at a very general and abstract level: for example, deontologists emphasize rights and wrongs while consequentialists emphasize the goodness or badness of states of affairs. And there are differences between particular theories within the broad families: within consequentialism, for example, welfarists emphasize preference satisfaction, whereas hedonistic utiliarians emphasize pleasure and pain...
Pages
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence Centre
- Global Consultancy LLC USA
- AUGP Int Legal Secretariat
- Medicina-OIUCM Department of Law
- ISTJ Therapeutic Juris Blog
- Global Role
- Law Resources
- Faculty of Philosophy and Religion
- Oxford Journals
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence Research Faculty of Law
- Universal Declaration of HR
- Law at Cambridge
- Global Synod
- Medicina Therapeutic Jurispudence FB Page
- Publications
- Seminars
- Lectures conducted and Disserations Supervised
- Workshops
- Biography
- Research
- National Law Summit re Constitutional Court
No comments:
Post a Comment